The Discord Leaks: Justification to Quash Encrypted Messaging?

(Psst: The FTC wants me to remind you that this website contains affiliate links. That means if you make a purchase from a link you click on, I might receive a small commission. This does not increase the price you'll pay for that item nor does it decrease the awesomeness of the item. ~ Daisy)

On April 13, the FBI took 21-year-old Air National Guardsman Jake Teixiera into custody for posting top secret military documents on a private Discord chat group. A large amount of classified information has been exposed, and people want answers. Why is this young man getting arrested when other people leak to the press all the time? Who gives a 21-year-old top-secret clearance? Are there some other, less-obvious motives at work here?

First, let’s look at the leaks.

Let’s look first at the leaks themselves. In early March, classified documents started popping up on a public Discord channel. They had originally been posted in a private, invitation-only chat group on Discord with a few dozen members in December 2022 or January 2023. At some point, one of the private group members started posting the classified documents to a public group. And once on the public group, the classified documents rapidly made their way around the internet. (source)

  • This series of leaks provided evidence that American intelligence had been spying on allies in Israel and South Korea. (source)
  • We had also been collecting intelligence on United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres (source)
  • There was a discussion of Egypt producing weapons for Russia, despite receiving over $1 billion per year from the Americans. (source) Egyptian and American officials both denied this vehemently.
  • Some of the leaked documents included information about a spring offensive in Ukraine. They also indicated that American leaders are not confident in Ukraine’s ability to successfully launch an offensive this spring, due to a lack of trained personnel. (source)
  • Nonetheless, despite a grim outlook for a Ukrainian spring offensive, no one is anticipating peace talks between Kyiv and the Kremlin in 2023. (source) The powers that be are prepared for 2023 to consist of a long, slow grind for Ukrainian and Russian troops.
  • Leaked information also includes the fact that American Special Forces groups have been in Ukraine for some time. (source) contrary to repeated statements about how no American boots were ever going to be on the ground. (source)
  • Information about a spring offensive could, in theory, jeopardize troops on the ground, though the Russians don’t seem to be taking the leaked information particularly seriously. Speculation within the pro-Russian channels seems to be that this is some kind of decoy. (source)

The rest of the leaked information provides a window into how the government actually works. Spying on allies and a fantastic disregard for taxpayer dollars—it sounds bad, but is it really surprising? And lying about American troops being on the ground? It’s less shocking, and more evidence of things many of us had suspected anyway.

What will happen to Jake Teixeira?

Either way, it looks like young Jake Teixeira is headed to jail, probably for at least ten years

If you grew up in a family full of soldiers and government employees, you might think, “Good, he’s a traitor.” But keep in mind information from the government gets leaked to the press all the time. New York Times reporter David Philipps admitted on Twitter that “The NYT worked feverishly to find the identity of the guy leaking TS docs on Discord. Ironically, if the same guy had leaked to the NYT, we’d be working feverishly to conceal it.”

Mr. Philipps removed his tweet after a short time, but independent journalist Glenn Greenwald took a screenshot of it and you can still see it on his Twitter feed here.

Honest, independent journalists are an essential part of what a free country is supposed to represent. In a free nation, the citizens hold the government accountable for their actions; how on earth is that supposed to happen if no one has any idea what the government is actually up to?

And even fifteen years ago, mainstream sources still seemed to see it this way. Back in 2011, the New York Times published information from Julian Assange’s Wikileaks, which contained information at least as volatile as the recently released information.

In this case, however, the Washington Post and New York Times actively helped federal law enforcement track down the leaker.  Whistleblower, Inc. immediately distanced itself from Teixeira, saying he doesn’t really count as a whistleblower/

So, why the about-face? A free press relies upon and has to support its sources of information. How did mainstream American press go from champions of free speech to actively hunting down leakers?

Let’s just look at the history of leaking over the past fifteen years.

Did you know that Obama’s administration prosecuted intelligence leaks more aggressively than any other administration in history? As of 2014, his administration had secured 526 months of prison time for various leakers. That compares to a total of 24 months of jail time issued by every other administration since the Revolutionary War. (source) The crackdown on intelligence leaks during his 8 years was completely unprecedented.

What about Trump’s presidency? Were leakers of sensitive information so relentlessly prosecuted?

Not if they published anything that made Trump look bad. General Michael Flynn, who was arguably just doing his job when he contacted the Russian government after he was appointed Trump’s national security advisor, had his conversations with the Russian ambassador recorded and then leaked to the press.

Releasing contents of phone calls between foreign ambassadors and the government is officials is far more damaging than anything released by Teixeira. Just for starters, it shows foreign governments around the world that Americans cannot exercise discretion. In his “System Update #70” on Rumble, Glenn Greenwald did a thorough analysis of why Gen. Flynn’s leaked transcript was so potentially damaging and, under other circumstances, could have led to jail time both for the leaker as well as the journalists publishing that information.

So, was that leaker mercilessly hunted down and prosecuted? Did any journalists look at jail time?

No. Mainstream media positively celebrated it; Brian Stelter’s self-congratulatory platitudes about the “free press” are totally nauseating.

MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough referred to the leaker of Flynn’s conversation as “a patriot.”

The New Yorker’s Evan Osnos tweeted, “. . .principled public servants who got the story out are hidden heroes.”

So, is Jake Teixeira being treated as a patriot or a principled public servant? Not quite. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby stated that “This is information that has no business in the public domain. It is not intended for public consumption, and it should not be out there.” But if this leak of information is so catastrophic, why are those same media outlets that helped find Teixeira reporting the material in the leaks? Given the number of articles generated by the Times, the Post, the BBC, and other major outlets, the leaks obviously contained a great deal of newsworthy information. Does anyone else smell hypocrisy here?

Who is Jake Teixeira, and how did he get top-secret clearance?

Maybe more significantly, if this leak of documents was so severe that a young Air National Guardsman is looking at more than a decade of jail time, why are no higher-ups getting prosecuted? Who gives top security clearance to a 21-year-old, anyway?

I spent time dating a 21-year-old National Guardsman when I was young. This is a demographic putting bags of dog poop on porches and lighting them on fire. Do many of them grow up to be mature, responsible adults? Oh, absolutely. But 21-year-olds are barely adults. Right now, mainstream sites like NPR are focusing on Teixeira’s apparent fondness for racist memes. if someone is not mature enough to understand that online jokes follow you for the rest of your life, why would they be mature enough to handle truly sensitive information?

And how does this not come up during the clearance process? Okay, so Teixeira had a bad sense of humor; who cleared him? I have heard absolutely nothing about any higher-ups facing consequences over this, and I guess that shouldn’t be surprising.

How will this affect encrypted messaging? And is that the point?

This may all be beside the point. Let’s talk about the method of release itself. These leaks have been referred to as the “Discord Leaks.” Discord is a messaging app. It doesn’t use end-to-end encryption, just the standard HTTPS encryption that allows people to communicate privately.

Federal law enforcement agencies have had private messaging apps in their crosshairs for some time now, as we discussed a few months ago. The EARN IT Act, which is still in the Senate, would essentially ban end-to-end encryption and make private messages easier for law enforcement to access.

There have been a couple of versions of EARN IT in the works since 2020; they haven’t passed. Too many Americans are still concerned about privacy.

However, is it possible that someone let these leaks percolate through Discord in hopes of giving the government an ironclad reason to force messaging apps to divulge information about private conversations? Because of national security?

What do you think is really going on here?

I don’t know if this is the case; I’m just speculating. But ask yourself what is believable.

Would access to such supposedly sensitive information be given to a young man with an irresponsible online history? Are more senior personnel capable of taking advantage of this situation to advance an agenda they’ve publicly had for some time now?

What do you think about all this? Should Teixeira be harshly prosecuted, or should he be protected as a whistle-blower? Is there another agenda at play here?

Let’s talk about it in the comments section.

About Marie Hawthorne

A lover of novels and cultivator of superb apple pie recipes, Marie spends her free time writing about the world around her.

Marie Hawthorne

Marie Hawthorne

A lover of novels and cultivator of superb apple pie recipes, Marie spends her free time writing about the world around her.

Leave a Reply

  • Great questions Marie and I believe there is clearly another agenda taking place. They have to make sure they take over the messaging apps too. Not to far from China now.

  • These leaks have to do with one thing and only one thing,getting the RESTRICT Act put in place as law,which is in direct violation of the constitution of the United States of America.The criminals within the U.S. government and its entities must shut down those who are getting the truth out about the crimes they are committing around the world.

  • Currently having 3 children in the military I find I have a little experience to speak. Correct me if I’m wrong, veterans out there.

    While I don’t know the honest full story, I believe this guy will be a scapegoat conveniently. Now I don’t know what he’s tweeted nor do I particularly care. Young(er) adults do & say some stupid stuff online & on base.

    To park on his age is irrelevant in my opinion. Eighteen year olds are qualified to lay their lives down for ours & suddenly 21 isn’t old enough for security clearance? That alone shows lack of knowledge of how MOS’ work in the military.

    High Sec clearances (I have 2 sons in these positions & yes one was 21 when cleared with it, the other since he went in at 19). If they score high on the ASFAB (up to 99 for Marines, 90 I think for AF) then the military uses their brains where they are most needed, regardless of age. This guy is obviously an intelligent guy. God knows what they’re getting these days with all their woke crap being forced down their throats & qualification standards being reduced so this will NOT get any better.

    Our family has been FULLY vetted 3x over & my kids have written some goofy stuff online (not hate nor iffy stuff). What’s your point? Let’s clean house on the upper echelon of the brass & administration that we KNOW has put our country in far worse danger than this young man. Yes, he took an oath. BUT what if he has uncovered some nefarious findings that is undermining that oath? Remember Snowden? Traitor or hero?

  • There’s a lot of things in this situation that don’t line up. I’ve heard that he was an Intel specialist and I’ve also heard that he was an IT specialist. Either way there’s no way he should have been able to get that info . The military compartmentalizes data to prevent this type of damage. There are plenty of security procedures to prevent illegal removal of the data so for him to do this all by himself is suspect. There has to be more going on than they’re saying.

  • A number of years ago, I was in the army, security agency (hasn’t existed for quite a while )with a TSSCI clearance I had 18 to 21 year olds working for me and they all did their jobs like they were supposed to. However, everybody understood that this information was not ours to disseminate we were simply custodians,is it fair that this young man is going to be punished while higher ranking people get away with all kinds of leaks? -no. But a 21-year-old E4 in the Air Force or the army is going to be to handled a lot differently, than somebody in the FBI, CIA White House, or the upper levels of the military. like it not a 21-year-old is a grown man. if it was an affair of conscience, methods now exist for taking your concerns through official channels. It sounds like this guy just wanted to impress his friends.

  • You really think they’ll be able to ban encrypted messages? They can’t stop spam and/or scam calls or emails. How are they going to stop software distribution?

    • It isn’t about banning it. It’s about it no longer being fully encrypted, which means people wouldn’t be able to communicate privately without the risk of the government accessing their personal messages.

  • I have my theories, like anyone else, but what I really want to ask is: Why is this an article on this site? How does this relate in any way, shape or form to prepping?

    A bunch of people that worry about the end-of-the-world scenarios that often include Internet outages in them probably don’t spend a lot of time thinking about the finer points of encrypted communications on the Internet. I would suppose that if a prepper is serious both about prepping and about encrypted comms, they’d be sending those comms via radio.

    I’m aware that there are a significant number of preppers serving in the military or with relatives in the military and they may have opinions on leaks of classified materials, but again, is this the place where such people should be discussing those matters?

    I’m really sick and tired of prepper sites being taken over by matters that have little or nothing to do with prepping. I think what happens is that anything that anybody thinks at some point may be a survival matter gets sucked into such places, but actual, physical survival of the keep-body-and-soul-together kind is definitely not the same thing as the survival of somebody’s idea about leaks of classified materials, encryption, or whatever else somebody feels is the big-stakes issue here.

    • First of all, it’s on this site because it’s my website, and I wanted to post it. ?

      Secondly, if you can’t understand how the loss of privacy affects preppers, you might need to head back to prepper 101. In a free society, privacy is sacrosanct. Preppers tend to be all about freedom and self-reliance, so obviously, this is a point of concern and interest for most of us.

      You regularly complain about the content here, which leads me to wonder why you’d click on articles that don’t interest you.

      Best wishes for finding a prepper site that meets your approval.

  • Scapegoat much? I find it difficult to believe that some junior grade air man would have access to materials intended for senior level decision makers that our nation’s enemies have not already reviewed and acted upon. This is clearly a setup with the intention of further demolishing citizen rights and empowering the interests of those that mean our nation harm.

  • Who gives a 21 yo a clearance? Good gravy… I had one, and had one for 30 years, and I never committed treason, leaked classified, moved emails to non-gov’t servers, etc., etc., ad nauseam. I see this repeatedly asked throughout media right now and it drives me nuts. I’ve had hundreds of troops, some very young, none of whom did what this jackalope did. Age is NOT the issue. Behavior is the issue. No one wrings their hands over a 50-something FBI agent turned Russian spy/collaborator, “Who gives a middle aged man with a weak ego in the midst of a mid-life crisis a TS clearance!” Please…

    This is what happens we keep growing government: Currently there are about 800,000 people within various parts of USG with TS/SCI clearances and close to 4M with Secret clearances. At this point it’s just playing the odds, right? With those numbers, someone is bound to leak, bound to participate in agenda pushing. (For anyone who thinks the military isn’t political, surely our eyes and ears have helped our brains process that that is not the case.)

    The real concerns, as addressed in other comments, is how this cat got access to things that aren’t available through military intel channels. Various agencies don’t share with mil, except thru one or two programs, and he wasn’t involved in those.

    Encrypted may not be as encrypted as we think it is – figure out who (or really what country) owns your favorite encrypted platforms. Or news sources, that’s another fun one. Telegram, for example, is owned by a Russian turned French (as if that’s better in the intel world! lol!) who lives in Dubai. And it’s notoriously chock full of disinformation. This then leads to another current topic, AI, Chat GPT, etc – how far away are we from not being able to trust what we see and hear? We already know trusting what we read is out the window. Just my thoughts, forgive the length of the rambling.

  • This crackdown on encryption started with Blackberry, which unlike others, did not implant back doors for the “5 Eyes”. In 2010, Saudi Arabia banned Blackberry sales unless it provided access to encryption codes. Other countries threatened as well. Blackberry caved. The cover story for Blackberry’s massive sales losses was “apps”. While the US (5 Eyes) and other countries did not openly threaten Blackberry, they were the beneficiaries. It’s been all down hill, ever since.

  • I suspect his “friends” on Discord were government agents. The Media aren’t showing any interest in identifying the “friends” who disseminated the material, nor do the authorities appear to be interested in prosecuting them.

  • You Need More Than Food to Survive

    In the event of a long-term disaster, there are non-food essentials that can be vital to your survival and well-being. Make certain you have these 50 non-food stockpile essentials. Sign up for your FREE report and get prepared.

    We respect your privacy.
    Malcare WordPress Security